606
PRODUCTION SUPPORTRestore customer-specific supply and closure

MTO 606 · PRODUCTION SUPPORT

How do you support Make to Order when the customer-specific chain goes wrong?

Trace the customer reference from sales order and individual requirement through pegged supply, production or procurement, assigned output, delivery, billing, and margin. Quantity can exist while ownership of that quantity is wrong.

MTO CHAIN

Keep the customer reference through every successor

  1. 01
    Sales order/itemCommitment
  2. 02
    Individual requirementDemand
  3. 03
    Pegged supplyAssignment
  4. 04
    Production/procurementExecution
  5. 05
    Assigned outputOwnership
  6. 06
    Delivery, billing & marginClosure

SUPPORT LOOP

Correct the relationship, not just the quantity

01TRIAGE

State customer impact

Record customer, sales order/item, material/configuration, promise date, requirement, supply, output, and financial impact.

02TRACE

Find the lost reference

Follow order/item → requirement segment → proposal → conversion → production/procurement → stock → delivery and closure.

03CLASSIFY

Separate the cause

Customer requirement and promise, requirement transfer, pegging, production/procurement, customer-specific stock assignment, change control, or commercial closure.

04RESOLVE

Correct the owning layer

Correct requirement, master-data strategy, planning relationship, execution, stock assignment, or financial closure—never bypass ownership casually.

05PROVE

Retest quantity and value

Validate customer/item, requirement, supply reference, output assignment, delivery, billing, production cost, settlement, and margin.

06PREVENT

Monitor traceability

Use requirement-transfer, pegging, firmed-supply, stock-assignment, change-alert, closure, and margin-reconciliation controls.

FIRST MTO DECISION

Which customer requirement owns this supply?

MTO separates physical availability from requirement ownership. Stock for another sales order or common stock does not automatically satisfy this order.

INDIVIDUAL VS COLLECTIVE

Know where the reference should continue and where common component supply is intentional.

FIRM SUPPLY VS CHANGED DEMAND

Committed supply may correctly need planner action after a customer quantity, date, or configuration change.

QUANTITY VS VALUE

Physical completion, delivery, billing, cost, variance, settlement, and margin are separate gates.

MTO DIAGNOSTIC PLAYBOOKS

Follow the customer-specific symptom

01 · Sales order did not create individual demand

Trace: item/schedule line → strategy → requirements type/class → transfer of requirements → individual segment.

02 · MRP did not create customer-specific supply

Trace: requirement segment → assigned supply → MRP → planned order or purchase requisition. Confirm uncovered demand in the right segment.

03 · Supply is linked to the wrong requirement

Trace: sales order/item → segment → proposal → conversion → production/procurement document. The reference—not supply existence—is the proof.

04 · Customer date changed but supply did not follow

Trace: changed demand → firmed proposal/order/PO → exception → planner action. A committed document may require controlled rescheduling.

05 · Production is complete but output cannot be used

Trace: confirmation → receipt → stock segment → sales-order assignment → available quantity. Check the intended MTO stock treatment.

06 · Stock exists but this order cannot use it

Trace: requirement ↔ assigned stock → ATP → delivery. Check another-order ownership, common stock, stock type, commitment, and plant/location.

07 · Delivery is complete but MTO is not financially closed

Trace: production cost → goods issue → billing/revenue → variance/results analysis → settlement → margin.

USE THE FULL PATHReturn to MTO when deeper context is needed

Use 101 for the model; 202 for requirement, promise, pegging, execution, stock assignment, change, and settlement controls; 303 for cross-process execution; and 404 for design proof.

Open the MTO path