202
MODULE TOPICExplore the capabilities that make R2R work

RECORD TO REPORT · DUNNING

How does SAP manage overdue receivables?

Dunning identifies overdue customer items, applies policy-based escalation, creates controlled correspondence, and retains the evidence needed to manage collection risk.

PROCESS ROLE

Dunning turns aging into consistent, owned collection action

Dunning procedures, levels, intervals, grace days, charges, interest, correspondence, blocks, customer exceptions, and review keep overdue follow-up aligned to policy.

OPERATIONAL FLOW

What happens in SAP

Read the sequence as one connected business event, not as isolated transactions.

01PREPARE

Maintain reliable open-item status

Customer open items, due dates, payment terms, disputes, promised payments, blocks, and collection ownership must be current before the run.

02PROPOSE

Identify eligible overdue items

The dunning proposal evaluates procedure, level, interval, grace period, item status, and customer exceptions against the approved policy.

03REVIEW

Approve escalation and correspondence

Collectors review proposed notices, disputed items, charge or interest treatment, contact details, and exclusions before output.

04FOLLOW UP

Record outcome and next action

Correspondence, customer response, promises to pay, disputes, payment plans, escalation, and write-off decisions update the collection trail.

DESIGN & CONTROL

What shapes the result

These controls work together; a locally correct setting can still produce the wrong end-to-end outcome.

Policy and master-data alignment

Dunning procedure, customer assignment, levels, days in arrears, intervals, grace days, charges, interest, and correspondence rules reflect approved collection policy.

Exception and customer protection

Dunning blocks, disputes, promise-to-pay status, legal holds, account ownership, correspondence approval, and contact-data control prevent inappropriate escalation.

Collection evidence

Proposal, notice, level change, activity, response, escalation, payment-plan, and write-off decision keep the overdue balance owned.

DIAGNOSTIC EVIDENCE

Show why an item was or was not dunned

An aging report identifies risk; the dunning trail explains the policy decision and the next action for every material overdue item.

ELIGIBILITY

Customer, invoice, due date, payment terms, procedure, dunning level, days overdue, block, dispute, and promise to pay.

CORRESPONDENCE

Proposal, notice date, level, form or channel, recipient, charges or interest, reviewer, and output status.

OUTCOME

Customer response, cash receipt, residual item, dispute, payment plan, escalation owner, and next review date.

COLLECTION CONTROL

A disputed invoice is excluded from escalation

A customer invoice is overdue but carries an approved dispute status. The dunning proposal excludes it according to policy, while undisputed overdue items advance to the correct notice level and owner.

  • Overdue population is complete
  • Exclusions are justified
  • Notices follow policy
  • Next actions are owned
Technical referencesSAP Help - Universal Journal
CONTINUE THE PATHContinue to R2R 303

See how continuous accounting, operational cut-off, parallel subledger workstreams, GL close, reporting, group hand-off, and period control connect.

Open practitioner map